Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniela Vismane vs Katherine Barnes Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Vismane vs Barnes analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniela Vismane vs Katherine Barnes Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Vismane 0 - 0 Barnes
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Vismane has won 44.03% of points on their second serve, while Barnes has won 49.65%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Vismane, in recent form, has won 55.74% of their opponent's second serve points, while Barnes has won 58.8%. The same stats for first serve returns are 43.3% and 45.44% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Vismane has saved 51.8% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Barnes has saved 55.29% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Vismane has won 50.82% of matches played (W/L 31/ 30), with Barnes winning 67.65% (W/L 23/ 11) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Vismane has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 27/ 13), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1). Barnes has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 4/ 2), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 3/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Vismane has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46.15% of matches (W/L 24/ 28), where as Barnes has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.16% of matches (W/L 12/ 7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Vismane has played against opponents with an average rank of 290.38 while Barnes has played against players with an average rank of 119.41.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Vismane has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Barnes has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Vismane has converted 46.93% of breakpoint opportunities, and Barnes has converted 49.5% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
399
Rank
228
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
61% (231-148)
Career Total W/L
60% (26-17)
48% (14-15)
YTD W/L
64% (7-4)
$34,000
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Daniela Vismane vs Katherine Barnes For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Vismane VS Barnes
Sportsbook
Offer
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniela Vismane | Katherine Barnes |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 48% (14/15) | 64% (7/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 43% (28/37) | 63% (15/9) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (287/312) | 58% (118/86) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 48% (14/15) | 60% (3/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| Aces Total | 7 | 2 |
| DFs per game | 0.16 | 0.18 |
| DFs Total | 48 | 18 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:50:16 | 1:36:21 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 234.17 | 218 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (1356/1917) | 61% (379/625) |
| 1st Serve W% | 54% (734/1356) | 60% (227/379) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (247/561) | 52% (128/246) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (130/277) | 48% (42/87) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (958/2010) | 49% (315/644) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 35% (7/13) | 64% (7/4) |
| Futures W/L | 88% (7/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 44% (12/27) | 64% (7/11) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (6/9) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (12/10) | 88% (8/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (12/2) | 13% (8/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 12% (17/2) | 0% (3/0) |
Daniela Vismane Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Hanne Vandewinkel
Player
Daniela Vismane
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
72%
(
43 of
60)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
29 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marie Benoit
Player
Daniela Vismane
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
41 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nika Radisic
Player
Daniela Vismane
76%
(
69 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
97)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
46%
(
42 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
97)
96
Total Points Won
92
|
2-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniela Vismane
Player
Sophia Ksandinov
51%
(
20 of
39)
1st Serve %
58%
(
22 of
38)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
13 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
51
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aneta Kladivova
Player
Daniela Vismane
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
31%
(
9 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
48%
(
38 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
45 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hannah Klugman
Player
Daniela Vismane
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
74%
(
37 of
50)
-
Aces
-
14
Double Faults
0
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
47%
(
45 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Daniela Vismane
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
81%
(
62 of
77)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
3
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
77)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Simona Waltert
Player
Daniela Vismane
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
85%
(
33 of
39)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 | 6-0 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Hanne Vandewinkel
Player
Daniela Vismane
78%
(
66 of
85)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
2
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
3
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
34 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
80
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Katherine Barnes Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Angelica Raggi
Player
Katherine Barnes
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Manca Pislak
Player
Katherine Barnes
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
101)
-
Aces
-
9
Double Faults
3
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
48%
(
31 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
54 of
101)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katherine Barnes
Player
Reka-Luca Jani
50%
(
47 of
94)
1st Serve %
71%
(
80 of
113)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
7
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
43 of
80)
45%
(
21 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
46%
(
43 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
55 of
113)
106
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Katherine Barnes
Player
Maya Drozd
47%
(
28 of
60)
1st Serve %
75%
(
41 of
55)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Sarah Tatu
Player
Katherine Barnes
78%
(
57 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Katherine Barnes
Player
Eliz Maloney
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Katherine Barnes
Player
Annabelle Lammas
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamira Paszek
Player
Katherine Barnes
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
12 of
39)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Katherine Barnes
Player
Ella Mcdonald
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
52%
(
23 of
44)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
9
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Vismane Vs Barnes Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Vismane are available here and Barnes photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
